<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Concussionix	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix</link>
	<description>thoughts and family activities in an industrial suburb</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: thduggie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thduggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and &quot;unassuming&quot; should mean &quot;not assuming,&quot; should it not?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and &#8220;unassuming&#8221; should mean &#8220;not assuming,&#8221; should it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thduggie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37491</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thduggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By the way, my dictionary already says something other than &quot;not limited:&quot; it says &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;unlimited&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;1 :&lt;/b&gt; lacking any controls : unrestricted &lt;b&gt;2 :&lt;/b&gt; boundless, infinite &lt;b&gt;3 :&lt;/b&gt; not bounded by exceptions : undefined.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It also bears remembering that the conventional limit placed on paid vacation is its duration and its point in time, so lifting those two limitations would indeed make the vacation unlimited in the conventional and contextual meaning of the word, even if the unlimited vacation isn&#039;t unconditional.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, my dictionary already says something other than &#8220;not limited:&#8221; it says </p>
<blockquote><p><b>unlimited</b> <b>1 :</b> lacking any controls : unrestricted <b>2 :</b> boundless, infinite <b>3 :</b> not bounded by exceptions : undefined.</p></blockquote>
<p>It also bears remembering that the conventional limit placed on paid vacation is its duration and its point in time, so lifting those two limitations would indeed make the vacation unlimited in the conventional and contextual meaning of the word, even if the unlimited vacation isn&#8217;t unconditional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SursumCorda		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SursumCorda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, the English language is being decimated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the English language is being decimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thduggie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thduggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting thought.  We could get chauvinistic and say that it does mean &quot;not limited&quot; in the American vocabulary, but the meaning is diluted on a sliding scale the closer the speaker is in character to a Verizon lawyer.  Or we could get philosophical and say that everything in this world is limited, so &quot;unlimited&quot; never truly means &quot;not limited,&quot; and thus the rental car company advertising a rental with &quot;unlimited miles&quot; is using the word correctly, even though time, speed limits, your gas money, maximum rental duration, and national borders may all put practical limits on those miles.  

So yes, the folks in sales, marketing, and the legal profession have all done their share to water down the word &quot;unlimited,&quot; but I think for most people in normal usage &quot;unlimited&quot; still means &quot;not limited.&quot;  There is a plethora of other unique words I literally worry about more.  The enormity of this noisome problem is staggering.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought.  We could get chauvinistic and say that it does mean &#8220;not limited&#8221; in the American vocabulary, but the meaning is diluted on a sliding scale the closer the speaker is in character to a Verizon lawyer.  Or we could get philosophical and say that everything in this world is limited, so &#8220;unlimited&#8221; never truly means &#8220;not limited,&#8221; and thus the rental car company advertising a rental with &#8220;unlimited miles&#8221; is using the word correctly, even though time, speed limits, your gas money, maximum rental duration, and national borders may all put practical limits on those miles.  </p>
<p>So yes, the folks in sales, marketing, and the legal profession have all done their share to water down the word &#8220;unlimited,&#8221; but I think for most people in normal usage &#8220;unlimited&#8221; still means &#8220;not limited.&#8221;  There is a plethora of other unique words I literally worry about more.  The enormity of this noisome problem is staggering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Daley		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Daley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if the dictionary will ever change the definition of &quot;unlimited&quot;, since it no longer means &quot;not limited&quot; in the American vocabulary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the dictionary will ever change the definition of &#8220;unlimited&#8221;, since it no longer means &#8220;not limited&#8221; in the American vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thduggie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thduggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the problem: in a large enough organisation, there are always those who play the system.  Unlimited paid vacation time is great, as long as there is nobody on the team who decides to take an unlimited paid vacation!  They must have very clear objectives to justify firing people who stop working entirely, which means it&#039;s a lot harder for management because they have to set those objectives in a fair way that gets the job done.  I&#039;ll be interested to hear from you how that experiment goes!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem: in a large enough organisation, there are always those who play the system.  Unlimited paid vacation time is great, as long as there is nobody on the team who decides to take an unlimited paid vacation!  They must have very clear objectives to justify firing people who stop working entirely, which means it&#8217;s a lot harder for management because they have to set those objectives in a fair way that gets the job done.  I&#8217;ll be interested to hear from you how that experiment goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SursumCorda		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SursumCorda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Then they missed a bet.  It definitely should have been published April 1.

In my (admittedly limited) experience, the more leeway a company gives its employees for a bit of goofing off, the better work they get.  Lots of Silicon Valley companies know that, and even the University of Rochester Computing Center did back in the 70&#039;s.  &quot;Goofing off&quot; not only reduces stress, it can lead to innovation and good ideas.

It takes a certain kind of employee not to abuse that, of course.  In the lab where I worked, there were a couple of people who couldn&#039;t handle it, which eventually ruined it for the rest of us.

To me, the question is, how do you encourage people to be the kind of employees who can benefit both themselves and their company through a good balance of seriousness and fun?

On a similar note, I&#039;m looking forward to hearing how it goes with our friend Peter&#039;s company, which just instituted a policy of unlimited paid vacation time....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then they missed a bet.  It definitely should have been published April 1.</p>
<p>In my (admittedly limited) experience, the more leeway a company gives its employees for a bit of goofing off, the better work they get.  Lots of Silicon Valley companies know that, and even the University of Rochester Computing Center did back in the 70&#8217;s.  &#8220;Goofing off&#8221; not only reduces stress, it can lead to innovation and good ideas.</p>
<p>It takes a certain kind of employee not to abuse that, of course.  In the lab where I worked, there were a couple of people who couldn&#8217;t handle it, which eventually ruined it for the rest of us.</p>
<p>To me, the question is, how do you encourage people to be the kind of employees who can benefit both themselves and their company through a good balance of seriousness and fun?</p>
<p>On a similar note, I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing how it goes with our friend Peter&#8217;s company, which just instituted a policy of unlimited paid vacation time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thduggie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thduggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think anything was handwritten or mis-read (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/x161246067q0h638/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;: it was submitted in February), but it&#039;s certainly a paper that must have started as a running gag at the University of DÃ¼sseldorf.  I doubt it was directly financed, but the researchers probably did put in some government-financed office hours...

I guess the question it really raises is whether remuneration means the wage-earner ought to render 100% serious, efficient work, or whether a certain amount of goofing off can be tolerated.  And in this case, it&#039;s goofing off that got the university some media spotlight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anything was handwritten or mis-read (see <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/x161246067q0h638/" rel="nofollow">here</a>: it was submitted in February), but it&#8217;s certainly a paper that must have started as a running gag at the University of DÃ¼sseldorf.  I doubt it was directly financed, but the researchers probably did put in some government-financed office hours&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess the question it really raises is whether remuneration means the wage-earner ought to render 100% serious, efficient work, or whether a certain amount of goofing off can be tolerated.  And in this case, it&#8217;s goofing off that got the university some media spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SursumCorda		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SursumCorda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is awesome!  It reminds me of my father&#039;s story of the paper presented in the April 1, 1948 issue of &lt;i&gt;The Physical Review&lt;/i&gt;, in which the authors, Ralph Alpher and George Gamow, inserted &quot;Hans Bethe (&lt;i&gt;in absentia&lt;/i&gt;)&quot; between their names in the byline.

Granted, the date on this paper (7 April 2011) is off by six days, probably because someone mis-read a European-style, handwritten &quot;1&quot; for a &quot;7&quot;.  (Note that I have used the European system of punctuation outside of quotes in that last sentence, acknowledging it as logical, if painful.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome!  It reminds me of my father&#8217;s story of the paper presented in the April 1, 1948 issue of <i>The Physical Review</i>, in which the authors, Ralph Alpher and George Gamow, inserted &#8220;Hans Bethe (<i>in absentia</i>)&#8221; between their names in the byline.</p>
<p>Granted, the date on this paper (7 April 2011) is off by six days, probably because someone mis-read a European-style, handwritten &#8220;1&#8221; for a &#8220;7&#8221;.  (Note that I have used the European system of punctuation outside of quotes in that last sentence, acknowledging it as logical, if painful.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Daley		</title>
		<link>https://www.thduggie.com/thduggies_blog/2011/concussionix#comment-37161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Daley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morbidcornflakes.ch/thduggies_blog/?p=309#comment-37161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow.  Though since it is on nih.gov, does that mean the money came from the US anyway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Though since it is on nih.gov, does that mean the money came from the US anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
